Texas Osage Cooperative Royalty Pool v. Clark

322 S.W.2d 506, 159 Tex. 441, 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 181, 1959 Tex. LEXIS 554
Texas Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 1959·No. A-6957·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is found in 314 S.W. 2d 109.

In its opinion the Court of Civil Appeals has held that the quoted language contained in the deed from Emil Zoch and wife, *442 Lydia Zoch, to T. Fred Evins, et al., trustees, dated September 9, 1930 (314 S.W .2d 111), under which petitioners claim title did not give respondent, Van Clark, notice of petitioners’ claim of title to an interest in the minerals in the Southeast Quarter (SE %) of Section No. 42 in Block 1, R. M. Thompson original grantee. We are not satisfied that the opinion in that respect has correctly declared the law. We are satisfied, however, that the application for writ of error filed herein presents no error which requires reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is “Refused. No Reversible Error.” Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Opinion delivered February 18, 1959.

Rehearing overruled April 15, 1959.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texas Osage Cooperative Royalty Pool v. Clark, 322 S.W.2d 506, 159 Tex. 441, 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 181, 1959 Tex. LEXIS 554 (Tex. 1959).

322 S.W.2d 506 (Texas Osage Cooperative Royalty Pool v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in Re Ronnie J. Troglin, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Tanknology/NDE Corp. v. Bowyer
80 S.W.3d 97 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Tanknology/NDE Corporation v. Robin Bowyer
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Hobbs v. Hutson
733 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Ernell v. O'FIEL
441 S.W.2d 653 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
RHEEM ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Rowe
332 S.W.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)