Texas & N. O. R. v. Bitterman

144 F. 46, 75 C.C.A. 204, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3821
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1906
DocketNo. 1,445
StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. 46 (Texas & N. O. R. v. Bitterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas & N. O. R. v. Bitterman, 144 F. 46, 75 C.C.A. 204, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3821 (5th Cir. 1906).

Opinions

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This case was submitted at the same time as the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Marcus K. Bitterman (just decided) 144 Fed. 34. The record discloses the same issues as therein presented, and it should be and is decided the same way. .

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that his cause be remanded to the Circuit Court, with instructions to enter decree in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Bitterman et al. (just decided) 144 Fed. 34.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville & N. R. v. Bitterman
144 F. 34 (Fifth Circuit, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. 46, 75 C.C.A. 204, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-n-o-r-v-bitterman-ca5-1906.