Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller

211 S.W. 246, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 481

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 1919·No. No. 2105.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HODGES, J.

In this suit the appellees recovered a judgment against the appellants for the sum of $300 as damages for injuries to a shipment of cattle. The appellants complain that a portion of the charge of the court erroneously allowed the recovery of double damages. We are of the opinion that the charge was subject to the criticism. However, we have made a careful examination of the record, and have reached the conclusion that the error complained of did not cause the rendition of an improper or an unjust verdict, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HODGES, J.

In this suit the appellees recovered a judgment against the appellants for the sum of $300 as damages for injuries to a shipment of cattle. The appellants complain that a portion of the charge of the court erroneously allowed the recovery of double damages. We are of the opinion that the charge was subject to the criticism. However, we have made a careful examination of the record, and have reached the conclusion that the error complained of did not cause the rendition of an improper or an unjust verdict, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Footnotes

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller, 211 S.W. 246, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 481 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

211 S.W. 246 (Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related