Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller

211 S.W. 246, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 481
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 8, 1919
DocketNo. 2105.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 S.W. 246 (Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Miller, 211 S.W. 246, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 481 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

HODGES, J.

In this suit the appellees recovered a judgment against the appellants for the sum of $300 as damages for injuries to a shipment of cattle. The appellants complain that a portion of the charge of the court erroneously allowed the recovery of double damages. We are of the opinion that the charge was subject to the criticism. However, we have made a careful examination of the record, and have reached the conclusion that the error complained of did not cause the rendition of an improper or an unjust verdict, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Ferris
89 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Garrison
30 S.W.2d 1108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W. 246, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-n-o-r-co-v-miller-texapp-1919.