Texas Menhaden Company v. Joe Bibbs
327 F.2d 492, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6561
Opinion
The chief contention on this appeal is that error was committed by the trial court in giving instructions on unseaworthiness. A careful review of the record fails to convince us that substantial or fundamental error was committed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Texas Menhaden Company v. Joe Bibbs, 327 F.2d 492, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6561 (5th Cir. 1964).
327 F.2d 492 (Texas Menhaden Company v. Joe Bibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.