Texas ex rel. City of West University Place v. City of Houston
322 U.S. 711, 64 S. Ct. 1159, 88 L. Ed. 1554, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 690
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182, 187, 191-92; Risty v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 270 U. S. 378, 390; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36, 40. (2) King Mfg. Co. v. Augusta, 277 U. S. 100, 103-4. Messrs. Everett L. Looney and Edward Clark for appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Texas ex rel. City of West University Place v. City of Houston, 322 U.S. 711, 64 S. Ct. 1159, 88 L. Ed. 1554, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 690 (1944).
322 U.S. 711 (Texas ex rel. City of West University Place v. City of Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Pasadena v. State Ex Rel. City of Houston
428 S.W.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1967)
City of El Paso v. Tuck
282 S.W.2d 764 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)