Texas Department of Public Safety v. Whitefield

Court of Appeals of Texas

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Whitefield

993 S.W.2d 886, 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 4270, 1999 WL 371289

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 9, 1999

DocketNo. 10-98-214-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 993 S.W.2d 886 (Texas Department of Public Safety v. Whitefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Whitefield, 993 S.W.2d 886, 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 4270, 1999 WL 371289 (Tex. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

Michelle Whitefield was arrested on November 20, 1997, for driving while intoxicated. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 1994 & Supp.1999). She submitted to a breath test which indicated a blood-alcohol level greater than .10. Whitefield was notified that her driver’s license would be suspended due to her blood-alcohol level. Tex. Transp. Code Ann. §§ 524.011-.015 (Vernon 1999). She timely requested a hearing before the administrative law judge (“ALJ”), and a hearing was held on January 7, 1998. Id. §§ 524.031, 524.035 (Vernon 1999). The ALJ sustained the suspension. Whitefield appealed to the County Court at Law No. 1 in Brazos County, which reversed the ALJ decision. Id. § 524.041 (Vernon 1999).

DPS seeks to appeal the judgment of the county court at law. We have recently held that we do not have jurisdiction over license-suspension appeals resulting from the refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test. Texas Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Barlow, 992 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.App. — Waco 1999); Tex. Transp. Code Ann. ch. 724 (Vernon 1999). Appeals of the ALJ decision under chapter 724 are governed by the procedures in chapter 524. Tex. TraNSp. Code Ann. § 724.047; Barlow, at 734 n. 1. Thus, our reasoning in Barlow applies equally to appeals arising under Chapter 524.

As in Barlow, this licence-suspension appeal arises from a judgment of a county court at law. The Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) provides for appeals from judgments of only the district court. Barlow, at 734-35, 741; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 2001.901 (Vernon 1999). Nor does the record reveal that the “amount in controversy” requirement for civil appeals generally has been satisfied. Barlow, at 738-34, 741; Tex. Civ. PraC. & Rem.Code Am § 51.012 (Vernon 1997).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

Michelle Whitefield was arrested on November 20, 1997, for driving while intoxicated. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 1994 & Supp.1999). She submitted to a breath test which indicated a blood-alcohol level greater than .10. Whitefield was notified that her driver’s license would be suspended due to her blood-alcohol level. Tex. Transp. Code Ann. §§ 524.011-.015 (Vernon 1999). She timely requested a hearing before the administrative law judge (“ALJ”), and a hearing was held on January 7, 1998. Id. §§ 524.031, 524.035 (Vernon 1999). The ALJ sustained the suspension. Whitefield appealed to the County Court at Law No. 1 in Brazos County, which reversed the ALJ decision. Id. § 524.041 (Vernon 1999).

DPS seeks to appeal the judgment of the county court at law. We have recently held that we do not have jurisdiction over license-suspension appeals resulting from the refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test. Texas Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Barlow, 992 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.App. — Waco 1999); Tex. Transp. Code Ann. ch. 724 (Vernon 1999). Appeals of the ALJ decision under chapter 724 are governed by the procedures in chapter 524. Tex. TraNSp. Code Ann. § 724.047; Barlow, at 734 n. 1. Thus, our reasoning in Barlow applies equally to appeals arising under Chapter 524.

As in Barlow, this licence-suspension appeal arises from a judgment of a county court at law. The Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) provides for appeals from judgments of only the district court. Barlow, at 734-35, 741; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 2001.901 (Vernon 1999). Nor does the record reveal that the “amount in controversy” requirement for civil appeals generally has been satisfied. Barlow, at 738-34, 741; Tex. Civ. PraC. & Rem.Code Am § 51.012 (Vernon 1997).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

993 S.W.2d 886, 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 4270, 1999 WL 371289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-department-of-public-safety-v-whitefield-texapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack