Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie

DecidedNovember 7, 2014

Docket12-14-00237-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie (Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-14-00237-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC § APPEAL FROM THE SAFETY, APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT V.

MILTON WYLIE, APPELLEE § UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant, and Milton Wylie, Appellee, have filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. In their motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement regarding the issues in the appeal. According to the motion, the parties have agreed that (1) Appellant will dismiss this appeal; (2) Appellee will withdraw his initial appeal of Appellant’s denial of his application for renewal of a concealed handgun license (CHL); (3) Appellee will not apply for a CHL until on or after December 8, 2015, provided that he meets the criteria at the time of his application, and (4) this court should render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the agreed motion to dismiss. We render judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement, and dismiss the appeal. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Opinion delivered October 30, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 30, 2014

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant V. MILTON WYLIE, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-CV-9287)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that they have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences, and for this Court to render judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement. Having heard and considered said motion, this Court is of the opinion the same should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that judgment is hereby rendered effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement and that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; all costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring them; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-14-00237-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC § APPEAL FROM THE SAFETY, APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT V.

MILTON WYLIE, APPELLEE § UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant, and Milton Wylie, Appellee, have filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. In their motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement regarding the issues in the appeal. According to the motion, the parties have agreed that (1) Appellant will dismiss this appeal; (2) Appellee will withdraw his initial appeal of Appellant’s denial of his application for renewal of a concealed handgun license (CHL); (3) Appellee will not apply for a CHL until on or after December 8, 2015, provided that he meets the criteria at the time of his application, and (4) this court should render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the agreed motion to dismiss. We render judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement, and dismiss the appeal. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Opinion delivered October 30, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 30, 2014

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant V. MILTON WYLIE, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-CV-9287)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that they have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences, and for this Court to render judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement. Having heard and considered said motion, this Court is of the opinion the same should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that judgment is hereby rendered effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement and that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; all costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring them; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Milton Wylie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-department-of-public-safety-v-milton-wylie-texapp-2014.