Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kenny Cobb, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 23, 2011
Docket11-09-00246-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kenny Cobb, Jr. (Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kenny Cobb, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kenny Cobb, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Opinion filed June 23, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-09-00246-CV __________

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant

V.

KENNY COBB, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 118th District Court

Howard County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 46519

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Texas Department of Public Safety appeals from an order expunging all records reflecting that Kenny Cobb, Jr. was convicted of the felony offense of criminal mischief. In its sole issue on appeal, the DPS asserts: “Cobb was not entitled to an expunction of records related to his arrest because he served a term of deferred adjudication as a result of that arrest.” The record shows that Cobb moved for a “partial expunction” of his records because his criminal history incorrectly indicated that he had been “convicted” of criminal mischief. It is undisputed that Cobb was not convicted of that offense but, rather, received deferred adjudication in 1983 and subsequently completed his probation without being adjudicated guilty. We agree with the DPS that Cobb is not entitled to an expunction of his “arrest” records. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 55.01 (Vernon Supp. 2010); Harris County Dist. Attorney’s Office v. J.T.S., 807 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. 1991). However, Cobb did not request that his “arrest” records be expunged pursuant to Article 55.01, and the trial court’s order does not explicitly expunge the records related to Cobb’s “arrest.” To the extent that the trial court order may be construed to expunge Cobb’s arrest record, we sustain the issue urged by the DPS. We note that, in its reply brief, the DPS states that Cobb’s computerized criminal history has now been corrected to remove any references to a conviction. We affirm the order of the trial court to the extent that it relates to records reflecting that Cobb was convicted of criminal mischief. However, to the extent that it may be read to require the expunction of records relating to Cobb’s arrest and deferred adjudication for criminal mischief, the order of the trial court is reversed. Cobb is not entitled to an expunction of the records and files related to his arrest.

PER CURIAM

June 23, 2011 Panel1 consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Hill, J.2

1 Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a successor by the governor.

2 John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris County District Attorney's Office v. J.T.S.
807 S.W.2d 572 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kenny Cobb, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-department-of-public-safety-v-kenny-cobb-jr-texapp-2011.