Texas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Latting

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 5, 2018·No. 03-17-00603-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-17-00603-CV 21640024 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/5/2018 2:15 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 03-17-00603-CV

FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1/5/2018 2:15:36 PM TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellant,

V.

SHELIA LATTING, Plaintijf-Appellee.

On Appeal from Cause No. D-l-GN-16-000284, in the 201 stJudicial District, Travis County, Texas, The Honorable Gisela Triana, Presiding

BRIEF OF APPELLEE SHELIA LATTING

THE HANEY LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C. 808 W 10 th Street, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 476-2212 Fax: (512) 476-2202 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Susan J. Haney State Bar No. 08908550 susan@thehaneylawfirm.com Caitlin Haney Johnston State Bar No. 24087661 Caitlin@thehaneylawfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE SHELIA LATTING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Index of Authorities ......................................................................... .iii

Statement of the Case ......................................................................... v

Statement Regarding Oral Argument ...................................................... vi

Issues Presented .............................................................................. vu

Introduction .................................................................................... 1

Statement of Facts ............................................................................. 2

A. Latting had a long history as a state of Texas employee .................. 2 B. Latting's Employment with TDA was terminated ......................... 5 C. Latting was replaced by two white, less-qualified women ................ 6

Summary of the Argument .................................................................... 7

Argument ........................................................................................ 8

A. Standard of Review ............................................................. 8 B. Latting establishes a prima facie case for discrimination ................ 10 C. At a minimum, a fact issue exists as to whether Latting was Qualified ........................................................................ 12 D. The "Reduction in Force" subject line is further evidence of discrimination .............................................................. 16 E. TDA's manipulation of the job posting is further evidence that discrimination was the cause ofLatting's termination .............. 19

Prayer .......................................................................................... 22

Certificate of Service ........................................................................ 23

Certificate of Compliance .................................................................. 24

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Baker v. Gregg Cnty, 33 S. W.3d 72 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2000, petition dism' d) ............................................................................... 10

Burger v. New York Inst. of Tech., 4 F.3d 830 (2nd Cir. 1996) ......................... 21

El Paso Cmty Coll. Dist. v. Chase, 355 S.W.3d 164 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2011, pet. denied) ............................................................................. 16

El Paso Cmty Coll. v. Lawler, 349 S.W.3d 81 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2010, no pet.) ......................................................................... 10, 12, 13

EEOC v. Manville Sales Corp., 27 F.3d 1089 (5th Cir. 1994) .......................... 17

Julian v. City of Houston, 314 F.3d 721 (5th Cir. 2002) ................................. 15

Little v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, 177 S.W.3d 624 (Tex. App.-Houston [Pt Dist.] 2005, no pet.) ........................................................................ 17

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) ...................... 9, 10, 16

Mesquite Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Mendoza, 441 S.W.3d 340 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2013, no pet.) .......................................................... 21

Mission Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Garcia, 372 S.W.3d 629 (Tex. 2012) ............................................................................................................. 9,10

Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prod., 530 U.S. 133, 120 S. Ct 2097 (2000) ... 16, 17

Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, 149 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. App.-Austin 2004, no pet.) .............................................. .15, 16, 21

Tex. Dept. Of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217 (Tex. 2004) ............ 8

lll

Tex. Natural Research Comm 'n v. IT Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849 (Tex. 2002) .............. 8

Russo v. Smith Int'l, Inc., 93 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App.-Houston [14 th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied) ............................................................... 17

Statutes

TEX. GOVT. CODE § 656.024 ................................................................. 19

TEX. LABOR CODE § 21.05 l (TCHRA) .................................................... 10

lV

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Nature of the Case: Sheila Latting is seeking damages for the termination of her employment on the basis of race. Latting is a Black woman who was employed as the Deputy CFO at the Texas Department of Agriculture ("TDA"), whose employment was terminated and she was replaced with two lesserqualified White women.

Course ofProceedings: Latting sued TDA for race discrimination under Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code on January 19, 2016. CR. 3. TDA filed a Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion for Summary Judgment on July 27, 2017. CR. 23. The trial court held a hearing on August 28, 2017. CR. 127

Trial Court: 201 st Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas, the Honorable Gisela Triana presiding.

Trial Court Disposition: The trial court denied TDA's plea to the jurisdiction on September 1, 2017. CR. 253

V

STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

Appellee agrees with Appellant that, because this appeal is potentially

factually complex, oral argument would be helpful to this Court in resolving this

appeal.

Vl

ISSUES PRESENTED

1. Did Latting meet her burden in pleading and presenting a prima facie case of discrimination?

Vll

INTRODUCTION

Latting was Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Texas Department of

Agriculture ("TDA"). Following the election of the new Commissioner of

Agriculture, Sid Miller, Latting initially impressed Commissioner Miller with her

knowledge and understanding of the TDA budget. Based on this positive

impression, Miller initially offered Latting the position of Chief Financial Officer.

In the midst of preparing to take over as Chief Financial Officer, Latting was

unexpectedly terminated. She was given a termination letter with the subject line

"Reduction in Force." The letter stated that her position would be eliminated. She

was not informed that any similar positions would be opening up at TDA in the

future.

The next business day, TDA posted two job descriptions with similar

descriptions to Latting's position as Deputy Chief Financial Officer. One of the job

listings even had the same position number as Latting's previous position.

Two white women were hired to take these two positions. Neither of the

women hired had the same extensive background in agency budgets as Latting.

Neither of the women were Certified Public Purchasing Buyers or had a similar

level of continuing education as Latting. In doing a side-by-side comparison, at a

minimum, a fact issue is created as to whether Latting is the better qualified

candidate and terminated because of her race, which precludes dismissal by a plea

to jurisdiction.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Latting had a long history as a state of Texas employee.

Latting is a Black woman who had been employed by the State of Texas for

approximately 21 years. CR. 146 at ,r 2. In June 2012, Latting was hired as the

Deputy Chief Financial Officer of TDA. CR. 146 at ,r 3.

On December 23, 2014, she was called into Commissioner Miller's office

where she met with the Commissioner and the Commissioner's campaign manager

Todd Smith. CR. 146 at ,r 3.

Miller and Smith questioned Latting at length about the possible

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Latting, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Texas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Latting (Texas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Latting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julian v. City of Houston
314 F.3d 721 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
411 U.S. 792 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda
133 S.W.3d 217 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
530 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy
74 S.W.3d 849 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)
Baker v. Gregg County
33 S.W.3d 72 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Little v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
177 S.W.3d 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Cooke
149 S.W.3d 700 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Russo v. Smith International, Inc.
93 S.W.3d 428 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE v. Lawler
349 S.W.3d 81 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
El Paso Community College District v. David D. Chase
355 S.W.3d 164 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Mesquite Independent School District v. Mendoza
441 S.W.3d 340 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garcia
372 S.W.3d 629 (Texas Supreme Court, 2012)