Texas Co. v. Sinclair
279 A.D. 803, 109 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1952·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The ordinance does not authorize the board to permit the nonconforming use to be enlarged into an area situated within the prescribed distances from the residence district and the school. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Texas Co. v. Sinclair, 279 A.D. 803, 109 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 803 (Texas Co. v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cappadoro Land Development Corp. v. Amelkin
78 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Nassau Children's House, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc.
77 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
MATTER OF JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST SYNAGOGUE OF THE N. SHORE, INC. v. Levitan
316 N.E.2d 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of the North Shore, Inc. v. Levitan
316 N.E.2d 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
First National Bank of Glens Falls v. Sheehan
30 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Gregorio v. Zoning Board of Appeals
232 A.2d 330 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)