Texas Clips, Inc. Robert D. Harry v. Sage Louetta, Ltd., Sage Interests, Inc. Weitzman Group, Inc. and David Stukalin

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 30, 2006
Docket14-06-00862-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Texas Clips, Inc. Robert D. Harry v. Sage Louetta, Ltd., Sage Interests, Inc. Weitzman Group, Inc. and David Stukalin (Texas Clips, Inc. Robert D. Harry v. Sage Louetta, Ltd., Sage Interests, Inc. Weitzman Group, Inc. and David Stukalin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas Clips, Inc. Robert D. Harry v. Sage Louetta, Ltd., Sage Interests, Inc. Weitzman Group, Inc. and David Stukalin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00862-CV

TEXAS CLIPS, INC. and ROBERT D. HARRY, Appellants

V.

SAGE LOUETTA, LTD., SAGE INTERESTS, INC., WEITZMAN GROUP, INC., and DAVID STUKALIN Appellees

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-32729

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 5, 2006.  The notice of appeal was filed on October 2, 2006.  To date, our records show that appellants have neither established indigence nor paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

On November 2, 2006, this court ordered appellants to pay the filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time)To date, appellants have not responded.  On November 7, 2006, appellee notified the court that the parties had settled the case.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Texas Clips, Inc. Robert D. Harry v. Sage Louetta, Ltd., Sage Interests, Inc. Weitzman Group, Inc. and David Stukalin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-clips-inc-robert-d-harry-v-sage-louetta-ltd--texapp-2006.