Texas Central Business Lines Corporation v. U.S. Polyco, Inc.
This text of Texas Central Business Lines Corporation v. U.S. Polyco, Inc. (Texas Central Business Lines Corporation v. U.S. Polyco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00004-CV
TEXAS CENTRAL BUSINESS LINES CORPORATION, Appellant v.
U.S. POLYCO, INC., Appellee
From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 92159
ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION
The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-
154.073 (West 2011). The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of
this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes … and the early settlement of
pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002. Mediation
is a form of ADR. Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator. Mediation is private, confidential, and
privileged.
We find that this appeal is appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a).
The Court assigns Deborah Hankinson as the mediator. Her address and phone
number are as follows:
Deborah Hankinson Hankinson PLLC 3838 Oak Lawn Avenue Dallas, TX 75219 (214) 754-9185
Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date of this order; however, it is
left to the parties and the mediator to agree on the location of the mediation.
No less than seven calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session,
each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet
setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before
the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to
understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the
information required by this Order.
Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each
corporate party must be represented by a corporate employee, officer, or agent with
authority to bind the corporate party to settlement.
Tex. Cent. Bus. Lines Corp. v. U.S. Polyco, Inc. Page 2 Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only
that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.
The mediator’s fee will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without
a fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must
each pay the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.
Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the
imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.
Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all
parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.
We refer this appeal to mediation.
The appeal and all appellate deadlines are suspended as of the date of this Order.
The suspension of the appeal is automatically lifted when the mediator’s report to the
Court is received. If the matter is not resolved at mediation, any deadline that began to
run or had not expired by the date of this Order will begin anew as of the date the
mediator’s report to the Court is received. Any document filed by a party after the date
of this Order and prior to the filing of the mediator’s report will be deemed filed on the
same day, but after, the mediator’s report is received.
PER CURIAM
Tex. Cent. Bus. Lines Corp. v. U.S. Polyco, Inc. Page 3 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed October 14, 2020 Do not publish
Tex. Cent. Bus. Lines Corp. v. U.S. Polyco, Inc. Page 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Texas Central Business Lines Corporation v. U.S. Polyco, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-central-business-lines-corporation-v-us-polyco-inc-texapp-2020.