Texas Cannel Coal Co. v. Consumers' Lignite Co.
This text of 173 F. 1022 (Texas Cannel Coal Co. v. Consumers' Lignite Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controversy in this case is over the amount of damages to be recovered for lignite unlawfully removed by the appellant from appellee’s land; the question being whether the trespass was inadvertent or willful. We find that Lowery, the general manager, was the representative of the appellant in determining how far mining operations should be carried on and extended, and it was conceded that he had full knowledge of the trespass committed. See U. S. v. Ute Coal & Coke Co., 158 Fed. 20, 85 C. C. A. 302. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-cannel-coal-co-v-consumers-lignite-co-ca5-1909.