Texas Brandon Corporation, Inc. and Ronald Wilson v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 27, 2021
Docket04-21-00535-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Texas Brandon Corporation, Inc. and Ronald Wilson v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy (Texas Brandon Corporation, Inc. and Ronald Wilson v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas Brandon Corporation, Inc. and Ronald Wilson v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 27, 2021

No. 04-21-00535-CV

TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants

v.

EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy, Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-03-00066-CVK Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

ORDER On December 2, 2021, this court received appellants’ brief. The brief was filed before the appellate record was filed. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record are currently due on January 10, 2022.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellants’ prematurely-filed brief is stricken. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9. Appellants’ brief is due within thirty days from the date the entire appellate record is filed. Appellants’ brief must comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1, 9.4, 9.5, 9.9, 38.1. Among other requirements, appellants’ brief must contain appropriate citations to authorities and must contain proper record citations to any documents referenced in the brief. See id. R. 34.1, 38.1(g), (i). This court will not consider any documents included in an appendix to appellants’ brief that are not contained in the clerk’s record. See Blank v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2005, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of December, 2021. ___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blank v. State
172 S.W.3d 673 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Texas Brandon Corporation, Inc. and Ronald Wilson v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Alicat, Energy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-brandon-corporation-inc-and-ronald-wilson-v-eog-karbuhn-oil-texapp-2021.