Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Teich

287 S.W. 666
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 1926·No. No. 6953.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

McOLENDON, o. J.

Motion by appellee to require clerk to issue mandate without payment of costs.

Appellee filed the affidavit required by R. S. 1925, art. 1866. Appellant contested, the affidavit, deposing that appellee owned two lots in the city of Austin assessed for taxes at $900. Appellee filed a counter affidavit to the effect that she is the head of a family, consisting of herself and a helpless invalid adult sister whom she supports from her earnings as nurse, that she and her sister live upon the property as a home, and have so lived since 1923. The property, she claims, is therefore homestead. Other than as to this property, appellee has fully complied with article 1866.

That the property is homestead follows from the following as well as other cases in this state. Wolfe v. Buckley, 52 Tex. 641; American Nat. Bank v. Cruger, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 17, 71 S. W. 784 (writ of error refused).

“A litigant need not sell or incumber exempt property, in order to give security for costs on appeal.” Boone v. McBee (Tex. Civ. App.) 280 S. W. 295.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Teich, 287 S.W. 666 (Tex. Ct. App. 1926).

287 S.W. 666 (Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Teich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stout v. Anthony
254 S.W.2d 879 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Pinchback v. Hockles
164 S.W.2d 19 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Standard Paving Co. v. Tolson
86 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co. v. Street
85 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Central Life Assur. Soc. (Mutual) v. Gray
32 S.W.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)