Texas Apparel Co. v. The United States

Federal Circuit

Texas Apparel Co. v. The United States

883 F.2d 66, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12026, 1989 WL 91184

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

Docket89-1149

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 883 F.2d 66 (Texas Apparel Co. v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas Apparel Co. v. The United States, 883 F.2d 66, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12026, 1989 WL 91184 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The United States Court of International Trade, in Texas Apparel Co. v. United States, 698 F.Supp. 932 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1988), held that the cost or value of sewing machines “used in the production of the imported merchandise,” including their repair parts and the cost of repairs, was properly included by the United States Cus *67 toms Service in the computed value of imported men’s, women’s, and boys’ jeans as an “assist” under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(h)(l)(A)(ii) (1982). Texas Apparel Co. has shown no error in Chief Judge Re’s thorough and well-reasoned analysis which specifically, seriatim, and correctly disposes of each of appellant’s arguments. Accordingly, that decision of the Court of International Trade, dated October 25, 1988, is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The United States Court of International Trade, in Texas Apparel Co. v. United States, 698 F.Supp. 932 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1988), held that the cost or value of sewing machines “used in the production of the imported merchandise,” including their repair parts and the cost of repairs, was properly included by the United States Cus *67 toms Service in the computed value of imported men’s, women’s, and boys’ jeans as an “assist” under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(h)(l)(A)(ii) (1982). Texas Apparel Co. has shown no error in Chief Judge Re’s thorough and well-reasoned analysis which specifically, seriatim, and correctly disposes of each of appellant’s arguments. Accordingly, that decision of the Court of International Trade, dated October 25, 1988, is

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

883 F.2d 66, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12026, 1989 WL 91184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-apparel-co-v-the-united-states-cafc-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack