Texas a & M University-Corpus Christi v. Upchurch

99 F. App'x 556
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2004
Docket03-10832
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 F. App'x 556 (Texas a & M University-Corpus Christi v. Upchurch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas a & M University-Corpus Christi v. Upchurch, 99 F. App'x 556 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Plaintiff-Appellant Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi appeals from the district court’s decision that Citizenship and Immigration Service properly denied Professor Jose Giraldo’s petition for an 0-1 visa. We affirm.

In 1999, Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi (the “university”) filed an 0-1 petition for one of its professors, Jose Giraldo, based on Giraldo’s academic excellence. The predecessor to Citizenship and Immigration Service (the “CIS”) approved the petition for September 1, 1999 until August 31, 2002. In 2002, the university filed a timely petition seeking extension of the original 0-1 petition. The CIS received additional information through a Request for Evidence. Based on the facts before the CIS, that agency denied the petition. The agency found that Professor Giraldo failed to meet the requirements set forth in the applicable regulation, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(0)(3)(iii). The university sought relief in the district court, but the district court upheld the agency’s decision and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The university appealed to this court.

We find that the district court gave appropriate deference to the agency’s decision. Professor Giraldo obviously has a good record, but he simply fails to meet the necessary requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(0)(3)(iii). Professor Giraldo cannot prevent the CIS from applying the guidelines in 2002 and thereafter because the CIS was lenient in granting Professor Giraldo a visa in 1999. The petition was properly denied.

For the above reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mott Thoroughbred Stables, Inc. v. Rodriguez
87 F. Supp. 3d 237 (District of Columbia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F. App'x 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-a-m-university-corpus-christi-v-upchurch-ca5-2004.