Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co.

748 S.W.2d 631, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 920, 1988 WL 39268

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 27, 1988

Docket01-86-00216-cv

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 748 S.W.2d 631 (Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 748 S.W.2d 631, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 920, 1988 WL 39268 (Tex. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court today considered the parties’ Joint Motion Not to Issue Mandate and to Dismiss Cause Based on Agreement of Parties.

Judgment was entered on December 10, 1985, in the 151st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in favor of appellee Pennzoil Company. This Court modified and affirmed that judgment on February 12, 1987. The Texas Supreme Court refused, n.r.e., appellant Texaco’s application for writ of error on November 2, 1987. On April 12, 1987, Texaco filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws. On March 30, 1988, Texaco filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which was dismissed by agreement of the parties on April 7, 1988.

In their motion, the parties state that the judgment of the 151st District Court, which *632 was affirmed in part and reversed in part by this Court, has been fully and finally settled, which settlement was approved by the bankruptcy court, and that no matters relating to that judgment remain open or pending. Because no further court action relating to the judgment remains to be taken, the parties request that this Court not issue mandate on its judgment and that it dismiss all further action in the case.

The parties’ joint motion is granted and the cause is dismissed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court today considered the parties’ Joint Motion Not to Issue Mandate and to Dismiss Cause Based on Agreement of Parties.

Judgment was entered on December 10, 1985, in the 151st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in favor of appellee Pennzoil Company. This Court modified and affirmed that judgment on February 12, 1987. The Texas Supreme Court refused, n.r.e., appellant Texaco’s application for writ of error on November 2, 1987. On April 12, 1987, Texaco filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws. On March 30, 1988, Texaco filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which was dismissed by agreement of the parties on April 7, 1988.

In their motion, the parties state that the judgment of the 151st District Court, which *632 was affirmed in part and reversed in part by this Court, has been fully and finally settled, which settlement was approved by the bankruptcy court, and that no matters relating to that judgment remain open or pending. Because no further court action relating to the judgment remains to be taken, the parties request that this Court not issue mandate on its judgment and that it dismiss all further action in the case.

The parties’ joint motion is granted and the cause is dismissed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

748 S.W.2d 631, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 920, 1988 WL 39268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texaco-inc-v-pennzoil-co-texapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack