Texaco, Inc. v. Blanchard

295 So. 2d 78, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4090
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 5, 1974·No. No. 9826·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SARTAIN, Judge.

This concursus proceeding was filed in the Twenty-third Judicial District Court for the Parish of Assumption. Judgment by way of confirmation of default was entered herein on the 17th day of September, 1973.

Counsel for all parties have filed with us a joint motion to reverse and remand on the grounds that the judgment rendered was contrary to the provisions of C.C.P. Art. 4657. The trial judge agrees and we concur because the record clearly reflects that the judgment entered herein is contrary to the provisions of C.C.P. Art. 4657.

Accordingly, the judgment rendered herein is reversed and set aside and this matter is remanded to the district court for trial on the merits in accordance with C. C.P. Art. 4657.

The cost of this appeal is assessed against plaintiff-appellant. All other costs are to await a determination on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texaco, Inc. v. Blanchard, 295 So. 2d 78, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4090 (La. Ct. App. 1974).

295 So. 2d 78 (Texaco, Inc. v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shell Oil Co. v. Minvielle
491 So. 2d 785 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Wood v. State Department of Highways
295 So. 2d 78 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)