Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. Watson
3 Willson 369
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 302. Continuance; first application for must be granted, when. Appellant’s application for a continuance was a first one, and it contained every requisite of the statute. The court erred in not granting it. When a first application for a continuance is in strict compliance with the statute, the court has no discretion in the matter, but must continue the cause. [Cleveland v. Cole, 65 Tex. 402.]
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. Watson, 3 Willson 369 (Tex. Ct. App. 1887).
3 Willson 369 (Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cleveland v. Cole
65 Tex. 402 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)