Tewarner Dailey v. United States

268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4171
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1959
Docket6065
StatusPublished

This text of 268 F.2d 219 (Tewarner Dailey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tewarner Dailey v. United States, 268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4171 (10th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

268 F.2d 219

Tewarner DAILEY
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6065.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 25, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

Donald A. Klene, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Donald E. Kelley, U. S. Atty., and James C. Perrill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, for the reasons stated in the trial court's memorandum opinion. D.C., 171 F. Supp. 744.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dailey
171 F. Supp. 744 (D. Colorado, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tewarner-dailey-v-united-states-ca10-1959.