Tevis v. State
This text of 8 Blackf. 303 (Tevis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Indictment for usurpation. Plea, not guilty. Verdict of guilty, and fine of one cent. Judgment accordingly.
This indictment is founded on two statutes. The offence charged is, that the defendant solemnized a marriage without being authorized to solemnize marriages. This offence is defined in the 9th section of the act -to regulate marriages. R. S. 1838, p. 411. The punishment is prescribed by the 47th section of the act concerning crime and punishment. R. S. 1838, p. 215. The indictment concludes against the statute. It should have concluded against the form of the statutes. The State v. Moses, 7 Blackf. 244
-The judgment is reversed. Cause re. manded, &c.
The State v. Hunter, ante, p. 212.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Blackf. 303, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tevis-v-state-ind-1846.