Teviro Casuals, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.
This text of 429 N.E.2d 830 (Teviro Casuals, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 814). Appellant failed to adduce any evidence, aside from its inventory computations, that it sustained any loss. Inasmuch as the exclusionary clause in the policy expressly provides that the policy does not cover losses the existence of which are proved solely by inventory computations, appellant failed to prove a prima facie case.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 N.E.2d 830, 54 N.Y.2d 915, 445 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teviro-casuals-inc-v-american-home-assurance-co-ny-1981.