Teves v. State
This text of 207 A.2d 614 (Teves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Teves, who was convicted in a non-jury trial of the larceny of two automobiles, of the larceny of a gasoline credit card and a vehicle registration card from another car, and of two charges of false pretenses by using the credit card, contends on this appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.
The State’s evidence showed that the automobiles were stolen; that a witness saw the appellant enter one of the vehicles and drive off; that he was arrested after beginning to drive off in the second car; that the credit card was stolen and that the appellant used it twice to obtain gasoline from service stations, signing the name of the owner of the card, and that he had it in his possession when apprehended. Manifestly, the evidence was sufficient to warrant the convictions.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 653, 1965 Md. LEXIS 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teves-v-state-md-1965.