Tevault v. Goord

297 A.D.2d 870, 746 N.Y.2d 923, 746 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8420
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge respondent’s determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing to obey a direct order and violating urinalysis testing procedures. The underlying determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tevault v. Goord, 297 A.D.2d 870, 746 N.Y.2d 923, 746 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 870 (Tevault v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Telesco v. Selsky
302 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)