Tetzlaff v. Incorporated Village of Amityville
This text of 249 A.D. 640 (Tetzlaff v. Incorporated Village of Amityville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by infant plaintiff for personal injuries by-reason of tripping in a hole in a sidewalk causing a fracture of an ankle. Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county in favor of plaintiff and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the depression, as described by plaintiff and her witnesses, was not more than four inches in depth, and was not of such character, taken alone, as to charge the village with negligence (Lalor v. City of New York, 208 N. Y. 431), the court charged in effect that the jury could find that the depression, together with a recent fall of snow, constituted a trap. That was the theory upon which the case was tried, and the verdict thereon is sustained by the evidence. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 640, 291 N.Y.S. 65, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tetzlaff-v-incorporated-village-of-amityville-nyappdiv-1936.