Tetzlaff v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Tetzlaff v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

926 So. 2d 1267, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 532, 2006 WL 797662

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 2006

DocketNo. SC04-591

StatusPublished

This text of 926 So. 2d 1267 (Tetzlaff v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tetzlaff v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 926 So. 2d 1267, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 532, 2006 WL 797662 (Fla. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Tetzlaff v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 866 So.2d 730 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), based on an apparent conflict with Dines v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 730 So.2d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Upon further consideration of the jurisdictional and merits briefs, we have determined that Tetzlajf and Dines are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in express and direct conflict pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and this review is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C. J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Tetzlaff v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 866 So.2d 730 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), based on an apparent conflict with Dines v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 730 So.2d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Upon further consideration of the jurisdictional and merits briefs, we have determined that Tetzlajf and Dines are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in express and direct conflict pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and this review is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C. J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 So. 2d 1267, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 532, 2006 WL 797662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tetzlaff-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fla-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack