Tetter v. Rapesnyder

1 U.S. 293, 1 Dall. 293
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided June 15, 1788·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

But,

by the Court:

There would have been something equitable in the objection to the report, if only two of the Referees had met; but, as it appears that they all entered on the business, though only two of them have subscribed the report, we can consider nothing but the evident mistake of the Clerk; and, for that reason alone,

Let the Report be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tetter v. Rapesnyder, 1 U.S. 293, 1 Dall. 293 (1788).

1 U.S. 293 (Tetter v. Rapesnyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

No. ____. Tetter v. Rapesnyder
1 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1788)