Tettemer v. Slisz
35 A.2d 716, 131 N.J.L. 185, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 169
This text of 35 A.2d 716 (Tettemer v. Slisz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tettemer v. Slisz, 35 A.2d 716, 131 N.J.L. 185, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1944).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Case, .Botone, Donges, IIbhee, Coxae, Dear, Wells, Eafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Graham v. Green
156 A.2d 241 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Malloy v. Capitol Bakery
119 A.2d 487 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
85 A.2d 229 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Larson v. Hergert
69 A.2d 218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Cierpik v. Borough of Manasquan
64 A.2d 890 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 A.2d 716, 131 N.J.L. 185, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tettemer-v-slisz-nj-1944.