Tettemer v. Slisz
35 A.2d 716, 131 N.J.L. 185, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 169
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Case, .Botone, Donges, IIbhee, Coxae, Dear, Wells, Eafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tettemer v. Slisz, 35 A.2d 716, 131 N.J.L. 185, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1944).
35 A.2d 716 (Tettemer v. Slisz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graham v. Green
156 A.2d 241 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Malloy v. Capitol Bakery
119 A.2d 487 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
85 A.2d 229 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Larson v. Hergert
69 A.2d 218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Cierpik v. Borough of Manasquan
64 A.2d 890 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)