Tetro v. State

581 So. 2d 1009, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7153, 1991 WL 128331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 581 So. 2d 1009 (Tetro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tetro v. State, 581 So. 2d 1009, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7153, 1991 WL 128331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. However, we remand so the judgment can be corrected. The state concedes that the written sentences do not conform to the trial judge’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. Avery v. State, 543 So.2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA), appeal dismissed, 553 So.2d 1164 (1989) (when written orders are inconsistent with oral pronouncements made at sentencing, the oral pronouncements prevail). The written judgment should be corrected to reflect that as to counts II, III and IV the trial judge imposed sentences of forty years in prison concurrent with each other, but consecutive to the sentence imposed on count I.

HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodberry v. State
611 So. 2d 1291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Harmon v. State
599 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Thomas v. State
595 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
McBee v. State
581 So. 2d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 So. 2d 1009, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7153, 1991 WL 128331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tetro-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.