Tetelman v. Fulton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Tetelman v. Fulton

170 Misc. 206, 9 N.Y.S.2d 930

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 170 Misc. 206 (Tetelman v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tetelman v. Fulton, 170 Misc. 206, 9 N.Y.S.2d 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The agreement of January 30, 1932, in reference to the payment of legal services contemplated only the payment of legal services in connection with the future management of the property and did not inure to the benefit of the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances the trial court was in error in granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Frankentbaler and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The agreement of January 30, 1932, in reference to the payment of legal services contemplated only the payment of legal services in connection with the future management of the property and did not inure to the benefit of the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances the trial court was in error in granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Frankentbaler and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 Misc. 206, 9 N.Y.S.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tetelman-v-fulton-nyappterm-1939.