Testa v. White

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Testa v. White

433 A.2d 688, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1364

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJuly 16, 1981

DocketNo. 80-530-A

StatusPublished

This text of 433 A.2d 688 (Testa v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Testa v. White, 433 A.2d 688, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1364 (R.I. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On May 21, 1981, we denied plaintiff’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) because plaintiff in filing his motion had not complied with Rule 28. Plaintiff has since supplemented his motion with the required memorandum.

Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record in this case, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, the motion to affirm is hereby granted.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On May 21, 1981, we denied plaintiff’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) because plaintiff in filing his motion had not complied with Rule 28. Plaintiff has since supplemented his motion with the required memorandum.

Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record in this case, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, the motion to affirm is hereby granted.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 A.2d 688, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/testa-v-white-ri-1981.