Testa v. White

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Testa v. White

433 A.2d 688, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1364

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 16, 1981·No. No. 80-530-A·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On May 21, 1981, we denied plaintiff’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) because plaintiff in filing his motion had not complied with Rule 28. Plaintiff has since supplemented his motion with the required memorandum.

Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record in this case, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, the motion to affirm is hereby granted.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On May 21, 1981, we denied plaintiff’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) because plaintiff in filing his motion had not complied with Rule 28. Plaintiff has since supplemented his motion with the required memorandum.

Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record in this case, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, the motion to affirm is hereby granted.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Testa v. White, 433 A.2d 688, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1364 (R.I. 1981).

Pincite

433 A.2d 688 (Testa v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.