Testa v. Blue Ridge Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Testa v. Blue Ridge Insurance

248 A.D.2d 461, 669 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2328

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 461 (Testa v. Blue Ridge Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Testa v. Blue Ridge Insurance, 248 A.D.2d 461, 669 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover the proceeds of an automobile insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated June 5, 1997, which denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was properly denied because a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the plaintiffs automobile was stolen (see, Vasile v Hartford Acc. & Indent. Co., 213 AD2d 541; Pilato v Nassau Ins. Co., 79 AD2d 971; Associates Discount Corp. v Insurance Co., 54 Misc 2d 1027).

The respondent’s request for the imposition of sanctions is without merit.

O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI