Test v. Test

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Test v. Test

19 N.J. Eq. 342

DecidedOctober 15, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.J. Eq. 342 (Test v. Test) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Test v. Test, 19 N.J. Eq. 342 (N.J. Ct. App. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

In this case it appears that the parties were married in January, 1865, lived together about three weeks, and since that time have lived apart. There is no evidence that defendant deserted the petitioner any more than that she [343]*343deserted him; I think not so much. They were boarding at her father’s. After some disagreement, she went away on a visit to her uncle, leaving him at her father’s. She never came back while he remained there; after he left her father’s, she came back. The circumstances under which they separated do not appear.

The decree for divorce must be denied, and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

In this case it appears that the parties were married in January, 1865, lived together about three weeks, and since that time have lived apart. There is no evidence that defendant deserted the petitioner any more than that she [343]*343deserted him; I think not so much. They were boarding at her father’s. After some disagreement, she went away on a visit to her uncle, leaving him at her father’s. She never came back while he remained there; after he left her father’s, she came back. The circumstances under which they separated do not appear.

The decree for divorce must be denied, and the petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.J. Eq. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/test-v-test-njch-1868.