Test v. Test

2016 MSPB 111
CourtMerit Systems Protection Board
DecidedOctober 1, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 MSPB 111 (Test v. Test) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Merit Systems Protection Board primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Test v. Test, 2016 MSPB 111 (Miss. 2016).

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD MSPB 2016 111 Docket No. , , v. , October 1, 2016

BEFORE

Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1

BACKGROUND ¶2

ANALYSIS ¶3

ORDER ¶4 This is the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1201.11 3(c) (5 C.F.R. § 1201.113(c)).

Document #: 1341589 v 1 2

NOTICE TO THE APPELLANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request review of this final decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You must submit your request to the court at the following address: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W. Washington, DC 20439

The court must receive your request for review no later than 60 calendar days after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you choose to file, be very careful to file on time. The court has held that normally it does not have the authority to waive this statutory deadline and that filings that do not comply with the deadline must be dismissed. See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991). If you need further information about your right to appeal this decision to court, you should refer to the Federal law that gives you this right. It is found in Title 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 (5 U.S.C. § 7703) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). You may read this law as well as other sections of the United States Code, at our website, http://www.mspb.gov/appeals/uscode/htm. Additional information is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pr o Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is contained within the court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The Merit Systems Protection Board neither endorses the services pr ovided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case. 3

FOR THE BOARD:

______________________________ William D. Spencer Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacinto S. Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management
931 F.2d 1544 (Federal Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 MSPB 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/test-v-test-mspb-2016.