Tessler v. Tessler
This text of 582 So. 2d 183 (Tessler v. Tessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the interests of judicial economy and to avoid the possibility of inconsistent verdicts, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari with instructions to consolidate for trial, the former wife’s “petition to vacate final judgment modifying primary physical residence of minor child and granting sole parental responsibility,” and her “motion for rehearing or in the alternative to set aside the order on former wife’s objections to the guardian ad litem’s report.” See Millman v. Reid, 511 So.2d 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); U-Haul Company of Northern Fla., Inc. v. White, 503 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Tommie v. LaChance, 412 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 So. 2d 183, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536, 1991 WL 134421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tessler-v-tessler-fladistctapp-1991.