Tessier v. Nashua

78 A. 495, 75 N.H. 572, 1910 N.H. LEXIS 57
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 6, 1910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Young, J.

The test to determine whether the tax assessed against the plaintiff is legal is to inquire whether Albina owes her for the land — not whether she is to pay interest on the deferred payments; in other words, whether the plaintiff is both the legal *573 and equitable owner of the land, subject to Albina’s right to purchase it, or whether she retained the legal title to secure the payment of what Albina owed her — the purchase price. It is not clear from the record as to how the fact may be, but if it is to be ascertained from the construction of the bond the tax should be abated; for if Albina fails to meet the payments as they become due, the plaintiff cannot recover them in an action on the bond.

Oase discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tessier v. Nashua, 78 A. 495, 75 N.H. 572, 1910 N.H. LEXIS 57 (N.H. 1910).

78 A. 495 (Tessier v. Nashua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Read v. Lewis & Clark County
178 P. 177 (Montana Supreme Court, 1919)
McGregor v. Ireland
121 P. 358 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)