Tesar v. State

281 S.W. 1065, 103 Tex. Crim. 648, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 1926
DocketNo. 10068.
StatusPublished

This text of 281 S.W. 1065 (Tesar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tesar v. State, 281 S.W. 1065, 103 Tex. Crim. 648, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355 (Tex. 1926).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment is one and one-half years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. Objections to the court’s charge are based on the claim that the evidence raised no issue authorizing certain instructions. Manifestly without having the facts before us we are in no position to review this matter. The same is true of • the special charges refused. In the absence of the facts proven we cannot determine whether the requested charges were appropriate.

•The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Morrow, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 S.W. 1065, 103 Tex. Crim. 648, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tesar-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.