Terzo v. Wiederkehr

270 A.D.2d 479, 704 N.Y.S.2d 666, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), entered May 10, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The act of painting a hallway is not work of an inherently dangerous nature as to render a building owner liable for the negligence of an independent contractor (see, MacDonald v Heuer, 253 AD2d 795; Rodriguez v Lex Assocs., 235 AD2d 354; Fischer v Battery Bldg. Maintenance Co., 135 AD2d 378; cf., Beck v Woodward Affiliates, 226 AD2d 328). Thus, the Supreme Court properly refused to submit an interrogatory to the jury on this issue. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terzo v. Wiederkehr, 270 A.D.2d 479, 704 N.Y.S.2d 666, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 479 (Terzo v. Wiederkehr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spitzer v. Kings Plaza Shopping Center of Flatbush Avenue, Inc.
275 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)