Terzian v. Gordon

Michigan Supreme Court

Terzian v. Gordon

229 Mich. 296

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 10, 1924

DocketDocket No. 118

StatusPublished

This text of 229 Mich. 296 (Terzian v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terzian v. Gordon, 229 Mich. 296 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Wiest, J.

By writ of error we are asked to set aside an unconditional order of the circuit court granting defendants a new trial and direct the circuit court to enter judgment for the amount plaintiff claimed, or, at least, for the amount found in his favor by the jury. It cannot be done. The Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98.

Writ dismissed on our own motion. No costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, and Fellows, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiest, J.

By writ of error we are asked to set aside an unconditional order of the circuit court granting defendants a new trial and direct the circuit court to enter judgment for the amount plaintiff claimed, or, at least, for the amount found in his favor by the jury. It cannot be done. The Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98.

Writ dismissed on our own motion. No costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, and Fellows, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 Mich. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terzian-v-gordon-mich-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack