Terzian v. Gordon

Michigan Supreme Court

Terzian v. Gordon

200 N.W. 943, 229 Mich. 296, 1924 Mich. LEXIS 889

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1924·No. Docket No. 118.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By writ of error we are asked to set aside an unconditional order of the circuit court granting defendants a new trial and direct the circuit court to enter judgment for the amount plaintiff claimed, or, at least, for the amount found in his favor by the jury. It cannot be done. The Mifflinburg Bank v.Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98.

Writ dismissed on our own motion. No costs.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, BIRD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, and FELLOWS, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By writ of error we are asked to set aside an unconditional order of the circuit court granting defendants a new trial and direct the circuit court to enter judgment for the amount plaintiff claimed, or, at least, for the amount found in his favor by the jury. It cannot be done. The Mifflinburg Bank v.Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98.

Writ dismissed on our own motion. No costs.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, BIRD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, and FELLOWS, JJ., concurred.

Terzian v. Gordon, 200 N.W. 943, 229 Mich. 296, 1924 Mich. LEXIS 889 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

200 N.W. 943 (Terzian v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related