Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co.

261 A.D. 994, 27 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8482

This text of 261 A.D. 994 (Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co., 261 A.D. 994, 27 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Action for specific performance of a contract which, among other things, provided for employment of respondent by appellant. Order, as resettled, denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action set forth in the complaint, on the ground it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 994, 27 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terzian-v-edison-photo-engraving-co-nyappdiv-1941.