Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co.

261 A.D. 994, 27 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8482

Opinion

Action for specific performance of a contract which, among other things, provided for employment of respondent by appellant. Order, as resettled, denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action set forth in the complaint, on the ground it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co., 261 A.D. 994, 27 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 994 (Terzian v. Edison Photo Engraving Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.