Terryberry v. Woods

69 Vt. 94
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Taet, J.

The burden of proving a fact alleged in a judicial proceeding is upon the person making the allegation, and this burden of proof, as it is called, never changes, but remains upon the alleging party throughout the trial. As the testimony upon the tidal is introduced, the weight of the evidence may vary from side to side, but the burden of proof remains upon the one making the allegation.

The defendant pleaded payment, and by so doing assumed the burden of proving it.

The defendant was not entitled to binding instructions upon a portion of the evidence, applicable to a single question. The request was properly denied. The instructions, as given, are not in question.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terryberry v. Woods, 69 Vt. 94 (Vt. 1896).

69 Vt. 94 (Terryberry v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shlopak v. Davison
34 A.2d 126 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1943)
In Re Estate of Jones
8 A.2d 631 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1939)
Illinois Steel Bridge Co. v. Wayland
192 P. 752 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Williams
98 A. 85 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co.
114 N.W. 733 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Conkling v. . Weatherwax
73 N.E. 1023 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)
Owen v. Brown
70 Vt. 521 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1898)