Terry Wendell Copeland v. Baltimore City Jail Baltimore City Jail Records Department Maryland Division of Correction

16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7285, 1994 WL 34882
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1994
Docket93-6626
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 409 (Terry Wendell Copeland v. Baltimore City Jail Baltimore City Jail Records Department Maryland Division of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Wendell Copeland v. Baltimore City Jail Baltimore City Jail Records Department Maryland Division of Correction, 16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7285, 1994 WL 34882 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Terry Wendell COPELAND, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY JAIL; Baltimore City Jail Records
Department; Maryland Division of Correction,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6626.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-1554-S).

Terry Wendell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copeland v. Baltimore City Jail, No. CA-93-1554-S (D. Md. June 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7285, 1994 WL 34882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-wendell-copeland-v-baltimore-city-jail-balti-ca4-1994.