Terry v. Terry

154 So. 3d 1013, 2014 WL 503183, 2014 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 18
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Terry v. Terry. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 59
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 7, 2014·No. 2110858·Published

Opinion

[1014]*1014 After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed in part and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Terry, 154 So.3d 1002 (Ala.2013). On remand, based on our prior holding, which was affirmed by the supreme court, the trial court’s judgment is reversed insofar as the trial court determined that Emily Brackin Terry, the mother, had not met her burden of rebutting the presumption in § 30-3-169.4, Ala. Code 1975, that her proposed move with the parties’ child to South Carolina was in the child’s best interest. However, in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, we remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to provide Adam G. Terry, the father, an opportunity to present evidence supporting his position that the proposed change in the child’s principal residence is not in the child’s best interest. The trial court is then instructed to enter a judgment based on the totality of evidence presented at. both the hearing held on remand and the earlier hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PITTMAN, THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry v. Terry, 154 So. 3d 1013, 2014 WL 503183, 2014 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 18 (Ala. Ct. App. 2014).

154 So. 3d 1013 (Terry v. Terry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Terry
154 So. 3d 1002 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2013)