Terry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Terry v. State

133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 385, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 377

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1926

Docket17218

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 103 (Terry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terry v. State, 133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 385, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 377 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the court’s rulings in the admission of testimony in one instance and rejecting testimony in the other are wholly without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J.,' and Bloodtoorfh, J., concur. Orrin Roberts, J. TF. LeCraw, for plaintiff in error. Henry H. West, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ltjke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the court’s rulings in the admission of testimony in one instance and rejecting testimony in the other are wholly without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J.,' and Bloodtoorfh, J., concur. Orrin Roberts, J. TF. LeCraw, for plaintiff in error. Henry H. West, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 385, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-state-gactapp-1926.