Terry v. State

940 So. 2d 1288, 2006 WL 3228699
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 2006
Docket5D06-3019
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 940 So. 2d 1288 (Terry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. State, 940 So. 2d 1288, 2006 WL 3228699 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

940 So.2d 1288 (2006)

Stephen TERRY, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D06-3019.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 9, 2006.

Stephen Terry, Quincy, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Stephen A. Terry, seeks certiorari review of the trial court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to rule 3.800(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to mitigate his sentence. An order entered on a rule 3.800(c) motion to reduce or modify a sentence is not appealable, however, it is subject to review in an extraordinary case under this court's certiorari jurisdiction. See Byrd v. State, 920 So.2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). As the appellant has failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to certiorari relief, the petition is denied.

DENIED.

PALMER, ORFINGER, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuehl v. Bradshaw
954 So. 2d 653 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
HYDLE v. State
940 So. 2d 1288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 So. 2d 1288, 2006 WL 3228699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.