Terry v. State
846 So. 2d 1232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 2003 WL 21296025
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2003·No. No. 5D02-2245·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm. Test results are admissible if a state-certified probation officer testifies about the nature of the test, how it is performed, and the number of times a test is administered; furthermore, the results will support a finding of probation violation as long as the testing is not the sole basis [1233] for the finding. See Terry v. State, 777 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terry v. State, 846 So. 2d 1232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 2003 WL 21296025 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
846 So. 2d 1232 (Terry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joey Dawson v. State of Florida
177 So. 3d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Queior v. State
157 So. 3d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Johns v. State
935 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)