Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Terry v. State

Terry v. State

846 So. 2d 1232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 2003 WL 21296025
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2003
DocketNo. 5D02-2245
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 846 So. 2d 1232 (Terry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. State, 846 So. 2d 1232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 2003 WL 21296025 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Test results are admissible if a state-certified probation officer testifies about the nature of the test, how it is performed, and the number of times a test is administered; furthermore, the results will support a finding of probation violation as long as the testing is not the sole basis [1233]*1233for the finding. See Terry v. State, 777 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joey Dawson v. State of Florida
177 So. 3d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Queior v. State
157 So. 3d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Johns v. State
935 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 So. 2d 1232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 2003 WL 21296025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.