Terry v. State
634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1994·No. No. 92-1864·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant’s offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse only the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terry v. State, 634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
634 So. 2d 660 (Terry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheriff of Brevard County v. Lampman-Prusky
634 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)