Terry v. State

634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 1994
DocketNo. 92-1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 660 (Terry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. State, 634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant’s offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse only the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and RAMIREZ, JUAN, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheriff of Brevard County v. Lampman-Prusky
634 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.