Terry v. State
This text of 634 So. 2d 660 (Terry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant’s offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse only the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 So. 2d 660, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685, 1994 WL 34070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.