Terry v. Sparrow (In Re Terry)
This text of 174 F. App'x 173 (Terry v. Sparrow (In Re Terry)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Gary Ivan Terry seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motions to review an agency decision, to dismiss the bankruptcy case, and to remove the bankruptcy trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and *174 dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Terry v. Sparrow, 328 B.R. 450 (M.D.N.C.2005; entered Mar. 31, 2005 & Apr. 22, 2005). Additionally, we deny Terry’s motions for a rehearing of the denial of his motion to disqualify counsel for the Appellee, for sanctions, for appointment of counsel, for review under the Administrative Procedures Act of Ap-pellee’s informal brief, to expedite oral argument, and to consolidate this appeal with three other pending appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-sparrow-in-re-terry-ca4-2006.