Terry v. Sonnier

Nevada Supreme Court

Terry v. Sonnier

443 P.3d 1128

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 2019

DocketNo. 78378

StatusPublished

This text of 443 P.3d 1128 (Terry v. Sonnier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terry v. Sonnier, 443 P.3d 1128 (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court's March 13, 2019, decision regarding an objection to a hearing master's recommendation in a matter related to child support arrears. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court's March 13, 2019, oral decision and minute order are of no effect and cannot be appealed. See State, Div. Child & Fam. Services v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 445,454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) ("[D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court's March 13, 2019, decision regarding an objection to a hearing master's recommendation in a matter related to child support arrears. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court's March 13, 2019, oral decision and minute order are of no effect and cannot be appealed. See State, Div. Child & Fam. Services v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 445,454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) ("[D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 P.3d 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-sonnier-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack